Demonstrant 2

 Jakarta, May 1998. Thousands of university students from across the country gathered around the Parliament building. Arif and his group of students from Malang arrived in the capital after a long train ride, packed with waves of demonstrators from all corners of Indonesia. They joined the massive movement demanding reform. Tear gas, warning shots, and clashes with the police became daily scenes. Yet, their spirit of struggle never faded.

In the middle of the crowd, Arif witnessed history being made. Reform finally came—Suharto stepped down—but the struggle was far from over. After the movement, Arif completed his studies, then chose to return to his village, where he built a school and distanced himself from the noise of politics.

Twenty-five years later, that same spirit of struggle lived on—but in a different form. Nadya, Arif’s daughter, was now a student at the State University of Malang, majoring in Indonesian Language Education. Although she didn’t live in a repressive era like her father did, she could see the widening economic inequality, the soaring prices of basic goods, and the growing public distrust toward the government.

But the times had changed. Where Arif and his peers organized movements through house meetings and printed leaflets, digital-era students like Nadya had far more powerful tools. Information now spread rapidly through social media, online petitions, digital investigations, and awareness campaigns on platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter.

One afternoon in her dorm room, Nadya read the news on her phone about a high-ranking government official involved in corruption. She opened her student Telegram group, where discussions were often more intense than in class. A message popped up:

“Peaceful protest in front of City Hall! We must speak up. If we stay silent, we’re letting injustice win!”

Nadya hesitated. She remembered her father’s stories about the great demonstrations of the past. But in today’s world, taking to the streets wasn’t the only way to fight for justice. Nadya began writing opinion pieces for her university’s online media outlet, digging through open-source data, and crafting critical analyses. Her article went viral, was picked up by national media, and sparked discussions among students across campuses.

That night, she called her father.

“Dad, back then you fought in the streets. Now, I feel the struggle can be done through writing, data, and social media. What do you think?”

Arif smiled on the other end of the line.

“Every generation has its own way. What matters most is honesty, social awareness, and clear strategy. Don’t just follow the crowd—make sure you truly understand what you’re fighting for.”

The conversation strengthened Nadya’s resolve. She realized that activism didn’t always have to take place on the streets. Times had changed, and so had the way students moved. She was now at the forefront of digital activism, safeguarding reform in a way that fit her generation.

---

Later, Nadya decided to return to her village at the foot of Mount Slamet after a series of experiences that had reshaped her views on activism. She wanted to share her story with her father, Arif, and hear his perspective on today’s student movements.

When she arrived home, she found Arif sitting on the porch, reading news on the tablet Sidra had given him years ago. Though he lived in a remote village, Arif kept up with socio-political developments through digital media and online discussions with his old friends.

“How’s Malang? Still as lively as ever?” Arif asked, looking at her warmly.

Nadya nodded. “Yes, Dad. But now student movements rely more on social media to organize. Street protests still happen, but our strategies are more diverse.”

Arif smiled. “Times change, but the essence of the struggle remains the same. Back then, we used leaflets, house discussions, and street protests. You now have the internet and social media. What matters is not losing the core of the fight itself.”

Nadya told him about Sidra, now a lecturer, who often guided her in understanding modern student movements. Sidra believed that activism wasn’t only about protests, but also about building public awareness through writing, dialogue, and data-driven advocacy.

Arif fell silent for a moment, reminiscing about his days with Sidra in the Student Senate. His old friend had become an academic shaping the next generation, while he himself had chosen another path—building education in the countryside.

“Sidra always had a sharp mind,” Arif said. “She understood that a struggle must continue—not just to oppose a regime, but to build people’s awareness.”

Nadya pondered this. She began to understand that there were many ways to fight. Her father chose education as his path; Sidra chose to shape young minds at the university.

“Dad, did you ever regret joining the student movement?” Nadya asked.

Arif shook his head. “Never. Every generation has its own role. What’s important is to stay true to your direction and principles. As long as you know your purpose, your struggle will never be in vain.”

Their conversation closed the night in warmth. Nadya felt more certain about her path. From generation to generation, student movements carried the same thread—resistance to injustice. Only the form and context had changed. What mattered most was holding onto one’s principles and not being swayed by fleeting interests.

Under the night sky at the foot of Mount Slamet, Nadya looked up at the stars. She knew the journey ahead was still long—but now, she was ready to walk it.

---

After months of involvement in various student discussions and actions, Nadya once again felt the urge to return home. She wanted to talk face to face with her father about all that she had experienced and how she viewed the current student movement. Carrying a backpack filled with clothes and her favorite books, she boarded a bus headed toward her hometown on the slopes of Mount Slamet.

During the ride, Nadya reflected on many things. She remembered Sidra, her senior and former student senate chair, who was now a lecturer still active in both academia and social movements. Sidra often said that the student struggle shouldn’t end on campus—it must reach communities, villages, classrooms, and even politics. The fight could take many forms; it wasn’t limited to the streets.

When she arrived, Arif greeted her warmly. Though older and more wrinkled, his eyes still burned with the same spirit as before. They sat on the porch overlooking the rice fields, sipping tea and talking.

“How’s Malang?” Arif asked.

“Crowded, Dad. Many friends still take to the streets. The same issues you once fought for—rising prices, corruption, declining trust in government—we’re still dealing with them. It feels like history repeating itself,” Nadya replied, gazing at the red-tinged evening sky.

Arif smiled faintly. “Struggles are like waves, my child. They rise and fall. Back in my day, we too believed we were living through great change. The Reform of 1998 was historic—but it wasn’t the end.”

Nadya nodded. “But it’s different now. We have social media, the internet—news spreads instantly, and everyone has a voice. But sometimes, that makes things even harder. Too many voices, too many hidden agendas.”

Arif sighed. “Technology has changed how people move. Back then, we relied only on newspapers, leaflets, and small talks in boarding houses. Now, information travels in seconds. But one thing must stay the same: the essence of the fight—standing for truth and justice. Don’t get lost in the noise.”

Nadya looked at her father with admiration. She knew he had endured much—from being a student activist to choosing the quiet life of building a rural school. He had chosen his own path of struggle, and perhaps she, too, would find hers.

“So, what should I do, Dad?” she asked softly.

“Keep going,” Arif replied. “But remember, struggle isn’t only on the streets. Education, literacy, and awareness-building are also forms of resistance. Choose your path.”

Nadya nodded slowly. Her talk with Arif gave her new clarity. The student movement wasn’t just about protests or speeches—it was about turning ideals into real change in all aspects of life.

That night, she slept with a calmer mind. Returning home wasn’t just about longing—it was about rediscovering her purpose. Tomorrow, she would go back to Malang, carrying a deeper understanding of what it means to be an activist in a constantly changing era.